Asus P5Q Deluxe: Intel P45 has arrived

Audio Performance

The audio performance tests were done using Audio Rightmark 6.0.5 and a 3.5mm gold plated, oxygen free stereo loop back cable between stereo out and microphone input. Results were taken at the DVD sample rate of 16-bit/48KHz and High Definition 24-bit/96KHz.

What we're looking for:

• Noise Level: A higher negative is better. This is usually viewed in relation to a signal level which provides a signal to noise ratio. As you get closer to zero there's more noise and lesser audio fidelity.
  
• Frequency Response: Two values listing how close to the lower higher frequencies the codec can reach. If it hits them perfectly it'll display a 0, 0.
  
• Dynamic Range: The difference between the loudest and quietest sounds the codec can make before it distorts them. The larger the gap, the better.
  
• THD and IMD percentage: Closer to zero is better. THD and IMD are best looked at together, where as if you have a lot of THD and not much IMD, then it'll offer a warmer accurate sound. High THD and IMD provides a warm, inaccurate sound, low THD and high IMD gives a cold inaccurate sound and finally low THD and IMD gives a cold accurate sound.
  
• IMD = intermodulation distortion and is a fancy way of saying conversion interpolation, which is a basic detection of the quality loss after an analogue to digital then digital to analogue conversion. By comparing it to a highly compressed source it shows up problems with the codec and converters.
  
• THD = total harmonic distortion, which shows up unwanted harmonics; integer multiples of the original component sound that can be second, third, fourth degrees or overtones for example.
  
• Stereo Crosstalk: where the stereo channels "talk" to each other and interact. Ideally you want them entirely separate, unmixed or echoed in either channel, so a higher negative a result as possible is preferred.

16-bit / 48KHz

24-bit / 96KHz

Asus includes the new ADI AD2000B chipset, an upgrade from the usual 1988B we're used to seeing on Asus boards – both of these provide the standard 7.1 Channel High-Definition sound we're used to but while the 1988B has often supported DTS:Neo PC it seems to have been dropped so far, or at least in this instance. The quality of the AD2000B however is marginally better than the 1988B in noise level and dynamic range at both standard and high-definition settings, but both still don't stand up quite as well to the premium Realtek ALC889a (885) chipset that is specific to Gigabyte, which also offers "content protection" support (software permitting).

The difference is very slight across all three though – you'll not be able to tell it on a subjective listening test and none even come close to the 100dB standard that discrete sound cards are often exceeding these days. For an integrated chipset though, it's still a slight evolution in the right direction.